 |
THE
FIELDS INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES
20th
ANNIVERSARY
YEAR |
Geometry
and Model Theory Seminar 2012-13
at the Fields Institute
Organizers: Ed Bierstone, Patrick Speissegger
|
|
Overview
The idea of the seminar is to bring together people from the group
in geometry and singularities at the University of Toronto (including
Ed Bierstone, Askold Khovanskii, Grisha Mihalkin and Pierre Milman)
and the model theory group at McMaster University (Bradd Hart, Deirdre
Haskell, Patrick Speissegger and Matt Valeriote).
As we discovered during the programs in Algebraic
Model Theory Program and the Singularity
Theory and Geometry Program at the Fields Institute in 1996-97,
geometers and model theorists have many common interests. The goal
of this seminar is to further explore interactions between the areas.
It served as the main seminar for the program on O-minimal
structures and real analytic geometry, which focussed on such
interactions arising around Hilbert's 16th problem.
The seminar meets once a month at the Fields Institute, Room 230,
on a Thursday announced below, for one talk 2-3pm and a second talk
3:30-4:30pm. Please subscribe to the Fields mail list to be informed
of upcoming seminars.
| Upcoming
Seminars |
|
Thurs., May 16, 2013
11:00 a.m.
Room 210
|
Vincent Grandjean, Universidade Federal do Ceara (Fortaleza,
Brazil)
Lipschitz contact equivalence classes of analytic functions do not
have moduli
To make a long story short, the (smooth) contact equivalence of two
mappings was introduced (1960's) by J. Mather in his tremendous work
about the stability of smooth mappings. For two germs of analytic
functions it just means that the ideals generated by each of the functions
are the same. Later, some notions appeared of topological (resp. bi-Lipschitz)
contact equivalence refining (resp. coarsening) various classifications
of smooth mappings with singularities. Recently Birbrair-Costa-Fernandes-Ruas
found a very simple equivalent definition of bi-Lipschitz contact
equivalence between germs of Lipschitz functions. The subsequent work
by Ruas-Valette shows that a similar simple equivalent definition
exists for the bi-Lipschitz contact equivalence for germs of Lipschitz
mappings. They also prove that germs of polynomial mappings of given
bounded degree admit only finitely many bi-Lipschitz contact equivalence
classes.
The result I will present concerns only germs of plane continuous
subanalytic functions. We show that they can be associated with a
finite combinatorial object, called a Hölder diagram, as a consequence
of the Bierstone-Milman-Parusinski rectilinearization theorem. The
main result is that this object completely classifies germs of plane
Lipschitz subanalytic functions under the subanalytic bi-Lipschitz
contact equivalence, which implies that there are only countably many
such classes. I will try to present, in the slightly simpler case
of germs of real analytic functions, the main ideas to understand
the combinatorial object (Hölder Diagram) encoding the germ.
This is joint work with L. Birbrair (UFC), A. Fernandes (UFC) and
A. Gabrielov (Purdue)
|
|
Wed., Sept. 25, 2013
2:00 p.m.
Room 230
|
Jacob Tsimerman, Harvard University |
| Past
Seminars |
Wed., March 6, 2013
2:00 p.m.
Room 230 |
Rahim Moosa, University of Waterloo
Algebraic reductions of hyperkaehler manifolds; model theory
In a 2010 paper, Campana, Oguiso, and Peternell make some observations
about the structure of the algebraic reduction map on a nonalgebraic
hyperkaehler compact complex manifold. Anand Pillay and I have given
a model-theoretic treatment of some of this material, leading both
to an abstract model-theoretic generalisation as well as a slight
improvement of the complex-goemetric result. I will report on this
work.
|
Wed., Feb. 13, 2013
2:00 p.m.
Room 210
|
Omar Leon Sanchez, University of Waterloo
The model-companion of partial differential fields with an automorphism
We explain how one can characterize the existentially closed models
in terms of differential-algebraic varieties, and then show that this
class is elementary using characteristic sets of differential prime
ideals.
|
Wed., Feb. 13, 2013
3:30 p.m.
Room 210 |
Patrick Speissegger, McMaster University
Are all non-oscillatory trajectories of three-dimensional real analytic
vector fields o-minimal?
A few years ago, Rolin, Sanz and Schäfke constructed a real
analytic vector field in real 5-space that has a non-oscillatory trajectory
that is not o-minimal. In real 2-space, no such trajectory exists,
but the question remains open in 3-space and 4-space. The construction
used for the example in 5-space cannot work in 3- or 4-space; together
with Le Gal and Sanz, we are trying to prove that no examples exist
in 3-space. In this talk, I will outline what we have learned so far.
|
Thurs., Nov. 29
2:00 p.m.
Room 230 |
Hadi Seyedinejad (Western University)
Fibre families of complex analytic mappings
Fibres of a morphism between complex spaces form a family that encodes
much information regarding the behaviour of the morphism. In fact,
the study of fibres leads us to efficient testing methods for specific
properties of the map, like openness and flatness. I will survey some
results from my PhD project, that are mostly efforts to extend certain
previous criteria to the general setting of maps over the singular
targets. I will also discuss the long term goal of my approach, which
is to classify different
non-regular (e.g., non-open) mappings in terms of singularities in
their family of fibres.
|
|
Thurs., Nov. 29
3:30 p.m.
Room 230
|
Gal Binyamini (University of Toronto)
Complexity of Noetherian functions
Noetherian functions are functions which satisfy certain systems
of differential equations. They are defined in a manner analogous
to the Pfaffian functions, but without imposing a triangularity condition.
The global finiteness properties of the Pfaffian class do not carry
over to the Noetherian class. However, Khovanskii and Gabrielov have
conjectured that local analogs of these finiteness properties remain.
In the first part of the talk I will introduce the Noetherian functions
and some old results on their finiteness properties. In the second
part I will describe some recent progress (joint with Dmitry Novikov)
toward the general conjecture mentioned above.
|
|
Oct. 11
4:30 p.m.
Room 210
|
David Marker (University of Illinois at Chicago)
Model Theory and Complex Exponentiation?
As the integers are definable in the complex exponential field
it's model theory has long been ignored. Still there are interesting
open questions about definability. Zilber proposed a novel model theoretic
attack. We will survey Zilber's work and later developments.
|
Oct. 11
2:00 p.m.
Room 230 |
Philipp Hieronymi (University of Illinois
at Urbana-Champagin)
Tame Geometry: A tale of two spirals
As part of Back2Fields
Colloquium Series |
| Past
Seminars |
back to
top
|
 |